|
By Sergio Chaim
How many among us becomes a guppy addict after
being caught by the colors of these swimming
gems in any of the fish shops spread all around
the world? Possibly you were a young boy, may
be a young girl, and you no longer remember
their shape or size, but surely you yet remember
their
color.
To finish my participation in this GuppyLabs
e-Bulletin project, I will share with you the
references I gathered and a few of my own personal
thoughts about how guppies produce the colors
that caught my yes at first glance almost three
decades ago.
The basic mechanism of color production in
guppies revolve around the interactions between
five chromatophores (Ueshima et al 1998, Ben
et al. 2003), out of the six
kind of chromatophores already reported in lower
vertebrates. As far as I know there are no scientific
reports of the occurrence of cyanophores
(blue chromatophores) in guppies although an
unknown kind of reflective chromatophore
was reported in guppies (Nakajima et al., 1999).
Chromatophores are cells located in the
skin of some vertebrates that enclose
cellular organelles (chromatossomes) which are
filled with coloring materials. These coloring
materials can be classified as: (1) pigments,
or biochromes, when they produce extracts which
resemble the color they show while in chromatossomes.
In such case the color is produced by the physical
phenomena of absorption and reflection of the
light. (2) Schemochromes, on the other hand,
produce extracts which do not resemble the color
they produce arising the so called structural
colors. Structural colors are produced by interference,
scattering and other physical
phenomena.
MELANOPHORES.
Melanophores are cells which enclose organelles
called melanossomes which are filled with melanin.
Melanin is synthesized from the amino acid tyrosine
present in the food. Actually there are at least
three form of melanins: pheomelanin, eumelanin
and neuromelanin. But only eumelanin occur in
fishe's chromatophores (Ito
and Wakamatsu, 2003). Some times people
make reference to them simply as melanin.
Accordingly to Fox (1976 - p222) melanins can
be black, brown, ruddy, tawny or buff colored.
Goodrich et all (1944), were the first to study
the melanophores of guppies with different body
base colors... "Our chief interest
in this study lies in the comparison of the
effect produced by the various gene combinations
on cells and cell arrangements. The cells studied
have been chromatophores - chiefly melanophores.
Of these we recognize the following types or
categories: (1) The dendritic melanophores.
These are exceedingly irregular in form, and
much variation is found. Most frequently there
are two or three irregular processes proceeding
from a relatively small cell body. They are
practically always located in the dermis superficial
to the scale and frequently may be lined up
at the edge of a scale. (2) The corolla melanophores.
These are so named because, in their configuration,
they often resemble a composite flower with
petal-like processes proceeding from a disc-like
center (Sumner and Wells, 1933). These
are located in the dermis, beneath the scales.
(3) The punctate melanophores. We believe it
to be homologous with the corolla type for reasons
mentioned later. They are small rounded cells,
occasionally extending short processes..."
... "Our description is of the female
pattern, or ground pattern, and is based chiefly
on the dorsal aspect shortly anterior and posterior
to the dorsal fin. There seems to be complete
dominance. Variation in the heterozygote has
not been observed. The Wild type (BG) female
macroscopically is of a gray-brown color and
is characterized by a diamond-shaped pattern
within the meshes of which may be seen other
somewhat more sparsely and irregularly distributed
melanophores. On the dorsal aspect the coverage
by melanophores is more uniform and the diamond
pattern only dimly visible. The diamond pattern
is formed of the corolla melanophores,
varying from 42 to
119 in
diameter when expanded, and are located at the
edges of dermal pockets in which the scales
are inserted. From this it follows that they
are normally observed on the through the next
anterior overlaying scale. The irregularly distributed
melanophores are of two types - the corolla
types, deeply located beneath the scales, and
the dendritic form in the superficial dermis.
Both types of cell are present at birth. Counts
were made of numbers of melanophores visible
in a measured area (0.9 sq mm) on various regions
of the body, which gives an average of 120.1
per 0.9 sq mm..."
The
Golden (Bg) female exhibits a more clear-cut
but also more variable patterns than any of
the other types. The difference is due the combination
of two factors: first, the larger size of both
dendritic and corolla type melanophores, the
latter varying from 70m
to
210m
in
diameter; secondly, the melanophores are more
definitely concentrated in the underlying diamond
pattern and also above this at the edges of
the scales, producing a superimposed scalloped
design which tends to accentuate the underlying
diamond network. The interstices of the mesh
are often clear of melanophores. The pattern
may vary considerably in different parts of
the body and in different individuals. This
is especially noticeable in half-grown fish
and gives a coarsely mottled appearance. ...
Neither type of melanophore is present at birth
but usually appears during the first week thereafter.
This is subject to considerable variation. Counts
shown only about 50 percent as many melanophores
per unit area as in the Wild and Blond.
The blond (bG) female is of a uniform yellow shade.
The melanophores are not visible macroscopically.
The corolla type cells of the Wild are replaced
by much smaller punctate cells. These are found
both in the diamond pattern beneath the scales
and deeply located in the interstices of the mesh,
a distribution identical with the corolla type
melanophores in the Wild and Golden types. These
cells as usually observed are concentrated, and
only rarely and then usually by special treatment
(see below) have any of them been seen in the
expanded or dispersed condition. Then they form
one or two blunt short processes. The punctate
cells vary from 7m to 14 m concentrated
and about twice this when dispersed. In addition
there is the usual complement of superficial dendritic
cells but these average smaller than those in
the Wild and Golden types. The cell counts show
a number comparable with that of Wild form, the
average per unit are being 118.1. Both types of
cell are usually present at birth. The xanthophores
are fainter and probably smaller than those in
the Wild.
The
Cream female (bg) is a uniform warm yellow color
and no chromatophores are macroscopically visible.
The melanophores are most frequently few in
number and sometimes are almost completely absent
in a given area. They consist of small punctate
cells tending to follow the diamond pattern
beneath the scales, while a few dendritic superficial
cells are located near the edges of the
scales. Both types of cells may be present at
birth. Recently we have found in our cultures
some individuals having a larger number of cells,
which, nevertheless, do not resemble Blond,
since the cells are restricted to the edges
of scales on the dorsal aspect of the body.
Counts are given in table 4, and here the second
and third listed cases are this later type.
There is also much variability in the different
areas of a single fish. The Cream gives a positive
reaction to the Dopa test, discussed below,
indicating the presence of "colorless"
melanophores and that therefore the fish may
be light colored because some disarrangement
of normal metabolic processes. The Cream is
not a hardy stock and is difficult to maintain
in homozygous condition."
Plate 1 in Goodrich et
all (1944).
Please, boss, insert here a figure of Plate
1 in Goodrich et all (1944) including foot notes
and title.
PLATE 1

EXPLANATION OF PLATE 1
A—D Photomicrographs of cell pattern of
the four phenotypes taken on dorsal midline
slightly anterior to dorsal fin. X43.
A, Wild; B, Golden; C, Blond; D Cream.
(C and D show clearly both dendritic and punctate
melanophores).
E From side of body of Wild to show diamond
pattern. X39.
F From dorsal aspect of punctate type to show
punctate and dendritic melanophores. X8o.
Table
5 in Goodrich et all (1944).

Nayudu and Hunter (1978) compared the melanophores
of wild type to those of guppies carrying Nigrocaudatus
II (NiII) gene: "In the study reported
here, a number of differences have been found
between NiII and wild-type melanophores in various
respects. The NiII melanophores are larger,
much more numerous, positioned at multiple level
in the dermis and between muscle bundles. This
last finding explains the macroscopically greyer
appearance of fresh muscle of NiII in comparison
with that of the wild-type. The wild-type melanophores
are smaller and less numerous, and positioned
only in the lower level of the dermis in a single
layer.
In this study the most significant finding is
that the NiII gene also causes the melanossomes
within the melanophores it be larger than they
are in the wild-type melanophores."
In another paper published a bit later (Nayudu
and Hunter, 1979) they went deeper: "Wild-type
melanophores are those present universally in
guppies. Others forming variable patterns may
be superimposed and are called mutant melanophores.
Figure 1 in Nayudu and Hunter (1979). .Expression
of the Melanie Patterns: a) Male Flavus (Fla);
b) Female Fla. Expression similar to male; c)
Male Pigmentierte Caudalis (Cp); d) Fe male
(:p. Expression less elaborate than male; e)
Male Nigrocaudatus II (NiII). blackening of
entire caudal peduncle, a portion of the tail
fin, and the posterior 1/3 of the body, the
tail fin in this example also carries Fla 1)
Female NiII, not as intense as in the male;
no tail pattern.

Table 1 in Nayudu and Hunter ( 1979). .

Cytology and pattern development
-
Wild-type tail fin melanophores visible at
one week before birth are always associated
with the fin rays and are often situated partially
between the two halves of a ray. Although it
is difficult to measure their size precisely
since their largest surface cannot be observed
externally, the diameter is approximately 10
to 20 mm in fish at one week before birth, growing
to 50 to 60 mm in 2-month-old fish.
The
caudal peduncle carries wild-type melanophores
of three different types: Large melanophores
dorsal ventral and lateral to the spine; corollar
melanophores in the dermis forming the characteristic
reticulated pattern for whish Poecilia reticulata
is named; and dendritic melanophores in
the dermis covering the scales. In fish one
week before birth, only the large dorsal, ventral
and lateral melanophores are pigmented. These
are also show at post birth stages. From 5 weeks
onward the dentrites are so thickly spaced that
they appear to have fused together to form a
thick branches off which smaller dendrites spread.
In mature fishes the melanophores are approximately
200 <
mm
in diameter, about twice the size of corollar
melanophores, and are also more densely pigmented.<
Two to 3 weeks after birth a few precorollar
melanophores (approximately 50 mm in diameter)
appear and are positioned where the diamond
pattern will develop. Gradually over the next
4 weeks these cells take on their corollar shape.
The change in shape from dendrite to corollar
is the result of proliferation of the cellular
projections. The cell body of corollar melanophores
is about 9 mm across and the total diameter
is 50 to 100 mm.
At
the age of 3 weeks to one month, the dendritic
melanophores in the scales begin to appear.
Fig. 3d shows two of these which have established
a bridge between their projections. These melanophores
are about one half the overall size of the corollar
cells, although the cell body is approximately
the same in both types.<
The mutant melanophores in the present study
are those which appear under the control of
one of the supergene complexes present in domestic
populations (Yamamoto, 1975). They have easily
distinguishable developmental and morphological
characteristics. Flavus tail pattern (Fla) melanophores
are intermediate in shape between the dendritic
and corollar cells of the wild-type and always
occurs in characteristic positions on the tail
fin. their overall size varies between 30 X
30 mm to 50 X 70 mm. The first pigmentation
appears at 2 weeks after birth and consists
characteristically of a triangular patch of
melanophores in the anterior dorsal corner of
the tail fin where it joins the caudal peduncle,
and a streak of melanophores along the ventral
edge of the fin. The melanophores spread as
they multiply and as result the adult pattern
(more elaborate in males than in females) encompasses
considerable individual variability in expression
while still being recognizable.
Pigmentierte caudalis tail pattern (Cp) is
composed of two morphologically distinguishable
populations of melanophores. One of corollar
type 90 X 90 mm is positioned along the caudal
peduncle-tail fin junction and forms the central
streak of the adult pattern. The other, bipolar
80 X 20 mm, occupies the dorsal and ventral
edges of the fin. The melanophores are first
visible at 3 weeks of age in a characteristic
pattern, reminiscent of accentuated wild-type
melanophores. The pattern develops to the stage
shown in Fig. 5d in females. In adult males
it elaborates further. Two extreme examples
of a phenotypic continuun are shown in which
the critical difference is whether the tail
fin growth started before or after the Cp edge
melanophores had spread around the posterior
of the tail fin. The latter alternative effectively
close the pattern and inhibits the spread of
the central streak melanophores.
Nigrocaudatus II (NiII), the only mutant body
pattern described in this study, is unique in
that it is expressed at birth. The melanophores
of which it is composed are relatively large,
90 to 100 mm at birth growing to 200 mm
diameter in adults, and are similar in appearance
to those which occur in the caudal peduncle,
dorsal and ventral apices in the wild-type fish.
In the early development of the NiII pattern
the dorsal, ventral and lateral spinal melanophores
spread from their original positions and cover
the diamond pattern melanophores. The large
melanophores then spread to generally occupy
the caudal peduncle dermis at all depths (Nayudu
and Hunter, 1978). Individual melanophores cannot
be distinguished at this stage. In addition,
further darkening takes place in the male at
the initiation of sexual maturity.
Concurrently with the development of NiII on
the caudal peduncle, the melanophores spread
onto the proximal portion of the tail fin and
produce a general darkening of characteristic
appearance. In maturing males the black area
becomes sharply delineated, but remains diffuse
in females until the age of one year or more."
Besides the above cited anatomic mutations
some physiological mutations also occur in melanogenesis
pathway leading to defective deposition of melanin
on the melanophores, e. g.: real red eye albinos,
simply called albinos, and grape/vine
red eye albinos, called lutinos.
Once or twice I saw postings in guppy forums
relating the occurrence of all grey offsprings
in F1 of out-crossings between two different
strains of real read eye albino guppies, that
made me think that we have at least two different
and complementary kinds of melanin defective
guppies.
Another mutation which effects melanophores
is the one called pink were melanophores in
the peduncle looks defective.
One last point, possibly about melanophores:
Did you ever got intrigued by the different
shades of grey found among the so called grey/wild
strains???
XANTHOPHORES AND ERYTHROPHORES
These kind of cells impart yellow, orange to
red colors to guppies. Like they enclose pigments
of the same groups and like they share the same
morphology and physiology I prefer simply call
all together as xanto-erythrophores. Xantho-erythrophores
enclose 2 types of coloring organelles; (1)
Pteridinossones which contain pteridines, sometimes
called pterins too; and (2) carotenoid droplets
containing carotenoids. Accordingly Fox (1976),
p 293, pterins can confer white, yellow, orange
or red colors, while carotenoids, p 67, can
be "various light, medium or deep shades
of yellow, orange, red or violet in color (may
be purple, blue, green, grey or brownish if
conjugated with proteins."
"Pteridines are derived from purines,
which are synthesized de novo by animals from
carbohydrates and proteins (Hurst, 1980)."
accordingly Grether
et al. (2001).
As far as I know Takeuchi (1975) was the first
one to study the pteridinossomes of guppies
but I had no access to his article. Again from Grether
et al. (2001):
"Two types of pigments were present in
the integument of the guppies examined. Yellow
hydrophobic compounds (carotenoids) were present
in both the orange-spot and the non-orange-spot
fractions, while red hydrophilic compounds (drosopterins)
were present solely in the orange-spot fraction
of males. Coloured pteridines were completely
absent from the integument of females.
...
The pattern that was produced precisely
matched the fingerprint pattern produced by
the three most abundant drosopterins in Drosophila
eye extract, specifically drosopterin, isodrosopterin
and neodrosopterin (Schwinck,
1975). Colourless pteridines were present
as well, notably isoxanthopterin and biopterin
(and an unidentified pigment, probably ranachrome-3,
according Henz et al.
(1977)."
Before you begin think that pteridines do not
impart colors to guppies I must say that
Grether
et al. (2001)
studied wild guppies populations from Trinidad
& Tobago and that they did not included
skin pieces taken from the head and from the
fins in their analysis.
On the other hand Ben
et al. (2003) reported the presence
of two cDNA isoforms for 6-pyruvoyl tetrahydropterin
synthase (PTPS) and of cDNA for xanthine dehydrogenase
(XDH) in the caudal fins of guppies cultivated
in Singapore. PTPS is an enzyme involved
in the pathway of dihydroneopterin triphosphate
to 6-pyruvoyl tetrahydropterin. 6-pyruvoyl tetrahydropterin
is later converted to 5,6,7,8-Tetrahydrobiopterin
(BH4). BH4 has been associated with the
synthesis of pteridine pigments in the goldfish
and zebrafish and BH4 enzymatic activity were
found to be significantly high in the erythrophores
of goldfish.
"Among the 12 different
guppy varieties that were included in the Northern
blot analysis, Yellow Tail, Leopard, and Yellow
Snakeskin contain xanthophores in decreasing
density in the caudal fin, and the PTPS mRNA
levels were found to decrease in the same order.
Red Tail, Red Snakeskin, and Red Metallic represent
guppy varieties with predominantly erythrophores,
and PTPS mRNA levels were highly expressed among
them. Purple Tail, Diamond, and Blue Metallic
have silvery iridescent caudal fins resulting
mainly from the presence of iridophores. Purple
Tail looks more yellowish than Diamond and Blue
Metallic, while Blue Metallic has deeper blue
iridescence than Diamond. The PTPS mRNA levels
were moderately expressed in these guppy varieties
and appeared to be related to the density of
the xanthophores. The lowest levels of PTPS
mRNA were found in the Blue Tail and 3/4 Black
Tail varieties, in which melanophores are abundant.
Adult females and juveniles
of the Doublesword variety, which lack pigment
cells on their caudal fins, were used as negative
controls. PTPS mRNAs were expressed at very
low levels. In contrast, the male Doublesword
contains predominantly xanthophores and iridophores
in the caudal fins. We were able to demonstrate
that the PTPS mRNAs were very weakly expressed
in the female and juvenile Doublesword but highly
expressed in the male. Thus, the PTPS mRNA level
appeared to be proportional to the density of
xanthophores and erythrophores in the caudal
fins of the various guppy varieties investigated.
...
The finding that PTPS mRNA
expression is proportional to the density of
xanthophores and erythrophores on the guppy
is in line with a study on goldfish (Masada
et al., 1990). In this particular study, the
activities of GCH and PTPS were found to be
significantly higher in erythrophores than in
melanophores, and they were barely detectable
in nonpigment cells such as fibroblast-like
cells. These results implied that there might
be significant production of sepiapterin and
other pteridines in yellow-red chromatophores
of fish relative to other pigment and nonpigment
cells. Our results provide evidence to support
the hypothesis that a de novo BH4 biosynthetic
pathway is involved in pteridine biosynthesis
in xanthophores and erythrophores. Since the
PTPS expression level in Blue Metallic is similar
to that in the colorless female Doublesword,
the association of PTPS mRNA levels with iridophores
is not evident. The PTPS expression in 3/4 Black
and Blue Tail is, however, significantly higher
than in the colorless female Doublesword.
Three possibilities could explain
this result. First, 3/4 Black Tail and Blue
Tail have xanthophores and erythrophores in
the caudal fins but are masked by a thick layer
of melanophores. Second, de novo synthesized
pteridines could accumulate in the melanophores
as a less abundant pigment. This is consistent
with the study by Masada et al. (1990), which
showed that melanogenesis in goldfish was accompanied
by pterinogenesis. Third, BH4 functions as a
critical cofactor of phenylalanine hydroxylase,
which converts L-phenylalanine to L-tyrosine
(Schallreuter et al., 1994a, 1994b), a precursor
of melanin synthesis. Thus, PTPS expression
in melanophores is necessary to supply a regulatory
cofactor for melanogenesis. The homogeneous
expression of PTPS in livers, in contrast to
its differential expression in caudal fins of
guppy varieties, implies that the high expression
of PTPS in liver may not be associated with
the pigmentation patterns of the caudal fins.
It also further suggests that pteridine biosynthesis
in xanthophores and erythrophores is not related
to that in the liver." (Ben
et al. 2003).
"Xanthine dehydrogenase
catalyzes the conversion of hypoxanthine and
xanthine to xanthine and uric acid, respectively
(Parks and Granger, 1986). It also participates
in the catabolic pathway of BH4, including the
conversion of 7,8-dihydropterin to 7,8-dihydroxanthopterin,
xanthopterin to leucopterin, and pterin to isoxanthopterin
and drosopterin (Hille and Nishino, 1995; Blau
et al., 1996; Ziegler et al., 2000). In poikilothermal
vertebrates and insects, XDH also controls the
synthesis of pigments for metallic and yellow
or orange colorations (Oliphant and Hudon, 1993).
...
Northern blot analysis indicated
that XDH expression was considerably lower than
PTPS expression in the guppy caudal fins (Figure
4, B). Like PTPS, the XDH mRNAs appeared to
be differentially expressed among the 12 varieties.
The caudal fins of Purple Tail and Diamond had
higher XDH expression than did Blue Metallic,
Blue Tail, and 3/4 Black Tail. Among these varieties,
Purple Tail and Diamond have a higher density
of iridophores. Among the predominantly red
guppy varieties, Red Metallic had the highest
level of XDH expression, and again it has the
highest density of iridophores. The XDH level
in Yellow Tail was higher than that in Leopard
and Yellow Snakeskin, although Yellow Snakeskin
is the only yellow variety that has a reasonably
high density of iridophores. Yellow Tail has
the highest density of xanthophores, and the
XDH level in the yellow varieties is likely
to be correlated to the density of xanthophores
rather than iridophores. Finally, the XDH expression
in male Doublesword, which has a high density
of iridophores, was higher than in juvenile
and female Doubleswords. In conclusion, caudal
fin XDH mRNA levels appear to be higher in guppy
varieties that have a higher density of iridophores,
with the exception of the Yellow Snakeskin.
...
XDH is involved in the biosynthesis
of certain pterins and purines. Isoxanthopterin
and xanthopterin are colorless pigments present
in the xanthophores of medaka (Hama, 1975),
while isoxanthopterin is a yellow pigment in
isopods (Nakagoshi et al., 1992) and xanthopterin
is a yellow pigment in zebrafish (Guyader and
Jesuthasan, 2002). The leucopterin and 7,8-dihydroxanthopterin
are reflective pigments in gizzard shad and
percids (Oliphant and Hudon, 1993). In wild-type
axolotl, the inhibition of XDH with allopurinol
induced the reduction of xanthopterin, isoxanthopterin,
biopterin, and sepiapterin in the xanthophores.
Furthermore, they showed a significant reduction
in xanthophores and iridophores, while melanogenesis
was enhanced (Frost and Bagnara, 1979; Thorsteins!dottir
and Frost, 1986). In zebrafish, there is a peridine
pathway associated with xanthophore pigments
(Ziegler et al., 2000). An alternative XDH pathway,
which catalyzes 7-oxobiopterin synthesis from
7,8-dihydrobiopterin and biopterin from the
precursor sepiapterin, has also been established.
The observation that the inhibition
of XDH activity enhanced melanin synthesis in
conjunction with the reduction of xanthophores
and iridophores in axolotl suggests that the
down-regulation of pigmentation in these chromatophores
is accompanied by the up-regulation of melanogenesis.
This linkage was also observed in the zebrafish
mutant nacre, in which the gene encoding the
microphthalmia transcription factor carries
a null mutation. The mutant has a body pattern
of 40% more iridophores and an absence of melanophores
(Lister et al., 1999). In the guppy, our Northern
blot analysis indicated different signal intensities
in caudal fins, but the expression levels were
too low in some varieties to be meaningfully
compared. Guppy varieties that lack iridophores
consistently show lower levels of XDH expression.
In contrast, it appears that XDH is more highly
expressed in guppy varieties that have a high
proportion of iridophores. However, this association
is not consistent, particularly in the Red and
Yellow Snakeskin, and Blue Metallic guppy varieties,
in which the XDH expression levels remain low
despite the presence of substantive iridophores."
(Ben
et al. 2003).
Hudon
et al. (2003) studied the carotenoids
present in guppies' integument and they found:
(1) "Thus, guppy skin mainly
contains esters of tunaxanthin alongside a few
unesterified monosubstituted carotenoids with
e end-rings.";
(2) "These results suggest that males deposit
a greater fraction of ingested carotenoids in
the skin than do females and that males route
the surplus carotenoids into the orange spots
as opposed to shunting carotenoids away from
general pigmentation and into the orange spots.";
(3) "Surprisingly, the whole-skin carotenoid
extracts of females were more similar in peak
wavelength to the male orange spot extracts
than to the male nonorange spot extracts.";
(4) "The peak wavelength of whole-skin
extracts was more similar between the sexes
within streams than among streams within a sex,
as reflected by a significant correlation between
the sexes across streams. This suggests an effect
of the local environment."; (5) "This
would seem to indicate that beta-carotene has
a stronger influence on peak wavelength of skin
carotenoids than does zeaxanthin. Similar results
were obtained for the nonorange skin of males.
In contrast, the peak wavelength of the orange
spots of males did not appear to be related
to variation in periphyton carotenoid composition."
"The carotenoid pigments
in the orange spots of male guppies were very
similar to those in the non-orange skin of both
sexes (mostly esters of tunaxanthin), which
is surprising given that the orange spots contrast
conspicuously with the remainder of the integument
and are absent altogether in females. Nevertheless,
the carotenoids in the orange spots differed
from those in non-orange skin in terms of pigment
concentration, peak wavelength, and the dependence
of these parameters on the environment. It is
probable that the orange spots and outlying
skin differ in other ways, for example, properties
of the iridophore layer, that contribute to
the color difference (G. F. Grether, personal
observation).
The concentration and peak
wavelength of carotenoids in the skin of guppies
were found to depend, respectively, on the amount
and composition of carotenoids in the algal
food base (periphyton), although these effects
differed somewhat between the sexes and between
the orange and non-orange skin of males (Fig.
7). The males in our sample had 5.4–8.9 times
more carotenoids in their orange spots per square
millimeter of skin surface than in the rest
of their integument. This was not accomplished
at the expense of the general integument, which
was endowed similarly to the general integument
of females. Instead, males appear to use more
of the carotenoids they ingest than do females
and channel the "surplus" carotenoids
into the orange spots. In LCA streams, males
have relatively low concentrations of carotenoids
in their orange spots, but elsewhere in the
integument the concentration of carotenoids
does not differ between LCA and HCA streams
(Grether et al. 1999; this article). This suggests
that general pigmentation needs are met before
sexual ones even though the amounts of carotenoids
found in the orange spots are greater than those
in the general pigmentation. Apparently, carotenoids
are not used in a strict order related to amounts
used but instead according to an adaptive hierarchy.
Carotenoid pigments are used for a variety of
other purposes and occur in a wide range of
tissues, as well (Needham 1974). Other proposed
functions of carotenoids, such as immune system
enhancement (Lozano 1994; Møller et al. 2000),
may rank higher in priority than general pigmentation
but require even smaller quantities of carotenoids.
The carotenoid composition
of the non-orange skin of both sexes was correlated
with the relative abundance of the known usable
carotenoids lutein, beta-carotene, and, to a
lesser extent, zeaxanthin in the periphyton
(Fig. 7). An association could arise if these
carotenoids were deposited unmodified in the
integument, or in this case served as precursors
for the carotenoids present in the skin. Tunaxanthin
is the main carotenoid present in the skin of
guppies (and the end product along a carotenoid
biochemical pathway in fish), but other carotenoids
were present as well.
Lutein can be expected to contribute
to the deposition of tunaxanthin in the skin
of guppies because it is a direct precursor
of that carotenoid (Miki et al. 1985). The contribution
of beta-carotene is harder to explain, as it
is many steps removed from tunaxanthin and not
a known precursor of the yellow carotenoid.
However, the identification of two probable
metabolites of beta-carotene on the path to
tunaxanthin in the skin of the fish examined
(compounds B and C) suggests that such conversion
may be taking place. Compounds B and C may appear
in the skin because of their relatively high
hydrophobicity.
Beta-carotene, and probably
other dietary carotenoids, also yields pigments
absorbing at longer wavelengths than tunaxanthin,
judging from the peak wavelength of skin carotenoids
above 438 nm (tunaxanthin’s peak wavelength)
in many fish. These were apparent particularly
in streams with higher relative abundance of
beta-carotene. Dietary carotenoids may be expected
to contribute to different degrees to skin pigment
composition as a function of the ability of
guppies to absorb, transport, and process these
carotenoids.
The slope of the relationship
between skin and dietary carotenoids suggests
that a slight increase in the peak wavelength
of ingested carotenoids would result in a disproportionately
greater increase in the peak wavelength of skin
carotenoids (note the different scale of the
horizontal and vertical axes in Fig. 7). This
observation would seem to indicate that the
pigment composition of the general integument,
especially in females, is very sensitive to
variation in the relative abundance of lutein
and beta-carotene in the diet. This sensitivity
was further borne out by the highly significant
correlation between peak wavelength of skin
carotenoids and the beta-carotene/lutein ratio
of the periphyton. The latter result could indicate
that beta-carotene or a metabolite counterbalances
lutein in some of the processes involved, although
other explanations are possible. Whether this
norm of reaction as a function of pigment availability
in the diet is adaptive or not will require
further investigation.
Another surprising result of
the present study was that the pigmentation
of the non-orange spot fraction of male guppies
is not equivalent to that of the general integument
of females, considering that the two may play
similar roles, such as crypsis or protection
from UV light, for example. Instead the pigment
composition of the integument of females was
consistently closer to that of the orange spot
fraction of males than to that of the skin outside
of the orange spots. At a physiological level,
the difference in pigment composition of the
general integument of males and females could
arise from the processes responsible for the
differentiation in pigment composition between
the two color fractions of the males if, for
example, the two skin areas of males differed
in their selectivity of carotenoid uptake, the
orange spots preferentially absorbing longer
wavelength-absorbing carotenoids, leaving shorter
wavelength absorbing pigments for the rest of
the integument or vice versa. Functionally,
the difference in pigment composition of males
may also provide for added visual contrast between
the orange spots and the surrounding skin. reasons,
besides phylogenetic constraints, for the use
of tunaxanthin.
Although carotenoid composition
of the non-orange spot fraction of males and
the general integument of females was correlated
with diet, that of the orange spot fraction
of males was not. This suggests that carotenoid
composition in the orange spot of males is controlled
by different factors than those operating in
the general integument." Hudon
et al. (2003).
Right now, and as far as I know, there are
three non genetic ways we can boost guppies
colors: (1) to work with their adaptation to
background colors and lightning, I'll return
to this point later; (2) use chemicals like
hormones or other stuff that causes pigment
aggregation or dispersion, this is, at least,
taken as a faulty posture in shows...; and (3)
supplement their diet with plenty carotenoids. See
Ako
et al (no date).
When I saw this report that guppies skin contain
tunaxanthin I figured about the use of tuna
flesh in pastes. Fortunately sounds that guppies
can produce tunaxanthin from lutein and beta-carotene.
Fox (1976), p 398, cites that Artemia convert
dietary beta-carotene to echinenone and, finally,
to canthaxanthin and that these are the only
carotenoids present in their eggs and nauplii.
At pages 402-403 he say that Crozier (1997)
was the first to show the ability of an animal
to convert tunaxanthin to astaxanthin,
either straightly or via zeaxanthin; and that
"Crozier's findings may be summarized as
follows, showing a range from red down to olive
drab, through which astaxanthin esters decreased
corresponding with increases of neutral xanthophylls,
principally tunaxanthin." Well, how could
we describe the color of the general integument
of a wild guppy, olive drab??? Isn't possible
that breeders of red guppies selected fishes
able to produce astaxanthin instead tunaxanthin???
Should I figure about the a possible inversed
pathway from astaxanthin to tunaxanthin since
most guppy breeders swear that feeding BBS improve
colors of any strain??? See NRC
(1993). What about e(i)chinenone??? See
Aquamedia
(no date). Food for thought...
On mutations effecting xantho-erythrophores
we have the so called blaus. (1) European blau,
is a recessive gene which prevent the deposition
of red and yellow pigments on the body and of,
at least, yellow pigments in the caudal fin;
(2) Asian blau is a co-dominant gene which in
"single dose", i. e. heterozygose,
prevents the deposition of red pigments on the
body and caudal (see micrographies of red and
blue grass taken Mr. Kobayashi 's collaborator
at guppy.to site) and while in "double
dose" prevent the deposition of both red
and yellow pigments on the body and caudal;
and (3) Hell blau, a rare recessive gene which
prevents the deposition of red and yellow pigments
on the body and, as far I know of red pigments
in the caudal fin.
Leucophores.
These cells render white color
to guppies integument because they possibly
enclose purine compounds in leucossomes.
"Purine compounds are derived in part from
nucleoproteins of the diet, although some animals
are undoubtedly able to synthesize them, probably
from amino-acids arginine and histidine.".
"In strict sense these compounds, being
colorless, are hardly to be classed as true
biochromes. However, since certain member of
the series, notably guanine and uric acid, contribute
opaque whiteness, glistering silvery aspects
or even iridescent colours to animals in the
lower groups, a brief consideration of them
probably belongs in this treatise." Fox
(1976), p 289.
"Of the purines which
constitute the white or silvery "pigment"
in the integumentary structures, guanine is
the greatly predominating member, while uric
acid is observed in some instances. ... Leucophores
are guanophores in which the guanine is deposited
in minute granules which are motile, and thus
migratory within the cell." Fox (1976),
p 289-290.
Takeuchi (1976) was the first one to describe
guppies' leucophores: "With dark-field
microscopy two distinct types of reflecting
chromatophores were observed to be numerously
distributed in the guppy tailfin. (Note: They
analyzed guppies having whitish tailfins
obtained from commercial hatcheries). ... the
leucophores are larger (Note: Authors were comparing
size of leucophores with the size of iridophores),
highly dendritic, and exhibited a dull whitish
color. The leucophores gradually contracted
20 or 30 min after tailfin was cut off. ...
In the tail fin taken from fish reared in melanine-saturated
water for two days, the leucophores had completely
disappeared.
...
The dendritic leucophores are very large, having
large and convoluted nuclei and cytoplasms with
a large number of characteristic pigment granules.
Nuclei usually lie at periphery of the cell.
Granular and fibrous elements are distributed
throughout the nucleoplasm, with a few aggregates
of granular elements suggestive of nucleoli
or chromatin.
The spherical or ellipsoidal pigment granules
of the leucophores, measuring about 0.5-0.8
mm in diameter, are enclosed by a double membrane
with a rather broad intervening space; the outer
membrane strongly resembles the delineating
membranes of other cytoplasmatic organelles
such as mitochondria and endoplasmic reticulum,
but the inner is reminiscent of lamellae, appearing
to originate from the fibrous materials so numerous
in the internal parts of these granules.
...
For
the identification of leucophores, the guppies
reared for one day in melanine-saturated water
were sacrificed and pigment granules of each
chromatophores were examined. Only the pigment
granules in the chromatophores described above
as leucophores exhibited conspicuous degenerative
changes. Outer limiting membranes of the granules
were torn off and frequently disappeared. Inner
lamellae and internal fibrous materials were
coagulated into small, thick membranous materials."
Takeuchi (1976).
Takeuchi (1976) did not reach a conclusion
about the nature of the pigments found in guppies'
leucossomes but I don't think that it is guanine
as stated as most possible by Fox (1976), despite
later author was not specifically making mention
to guppies. (1) If guppies' leucossomes were
filed with the same material found in their
iridophores I would expect that, at least partially,
both presented the same response to melanin
treatment; and (2) In Medaka, that is a classical
species in chromatophore's study (Chromatopapers
1 and Chromatopapers
2), so much more studied than guppies; that
carry some similarities with guppies in the
carotenoid content of xanto-erythrophores (Hirao
et al., 1969) and in the occurrence of similar
mutations effecting color cells (Takeuchi,
1975b); was found that leucossomes are filled
with uric acid (Hama,
1975).
Iridophores.
Iridophores and leucophores are the cells which
produce the so called structural colors. The
cells of both above mentioned chromatophores
enclose pigments of similar origin (purines)
and accordingly some sources the also enclose
the same "pigmentary compound". "When
the purine material is in fixed crystalline
platelets, manifesting a scintillating iridescent
or metallic appearance, the cells containing
them are termed iridophores or iridocytes."
Fox (1976), p 290.
Takeuchi (1976) was the first one to microscopically
describe guppies' iridophores too: "The
iridophores are smaller (Note: When compared
to leucophores), having a metallic iridescent
color, ... The cytoplasm of iridophores of the
guppy contain a large number of laminated cisternae
or "reflecting platelets". Each of
these platelets is surrounded by its own limiting
membrane. Their lengths vary from 0.7 to 0.2
mm
and their diameters are approximately 35 mm.
The platelets are found in several groups. Within
each group several platelets, sometimes up to
17 or 18, are stacked up with an interval of
about 150 mm.
Angles among groups are variable. Many of the
platelets are split longitudinally, exhibiting
empty spaces. Electron microscopy reveals that
these longitudinal splittings are initially
narrow, but the electron bean rapidly enlarged
them in various degrees, markedly affecting
their appearance. Therefore, carbon-coated sections
were used for detailed observation of these
platelets. The longitudinal splitting extended
either the entire length of the platelets, or
was interrupted at irregular intervals. In the
center of platelets that were not split, very
thin lamellas materials extended over the entire
axis. In some platelets in where only partial
longitudinal splitting had occurred, the interconnection
between these lamellae and the splitting was
clearly noticed." Takeuchi
(1976).
Recently Gundersen
and Rivera (2005) also studied this subject
but I was not yet able to get a copy of their
article.
Fox (1976), chapters IV and V, provide us an
excellent review on the physical mechanisms
by which structural colors are produced, i.
e. scattering,
diffraction and interference.
Scattering, sometimes called Tyndall scattering,
occurs when a light bean impinges upon particles
with a mean diameter less than about 0.7 m
and that are not orderly oriented,
actually they are in a state of random dispersal
. Diffraction is also produced by particles
which are not orderly oriented but in this case
the particles are larger, exceeding about 1
m
(Fox,1976,p
21, 41). "The kind
and intensity of colour, and the intensity of
Tyndall cone, observed when a bean of light
is passed through a light-scattering medium,
depend upon the degree of fineness of the small
particles in the suspension, and upon the magnitude
of difference between the refractive index of
the particles and that of the fluid medium.
Sufficiently small particles yield violet colours
of striking intensity and purity; increasingly
larger ones give a series of deep to pale blue
colours, passing to white when approaching 1
m
in the
mean diameter."
"Mason
(1923a) has emphasized the importance
of actually seeing and devoting some optical
study to Tyndall blues in order to understand
the principles by which underlie their manifestation,
and to differentiate them clearly form
the other blues aspects. A summary of the characteristics
of Tyndall blues and the properties of media
which lead to their manifestation includes the
various points listed by Mason:
(1) The manifestation of blue color depends
upon the presence of minute bodies or other
optical heterogeneities whose refractive index
differs from that of surrounding medium.
(2) The diameter of light-scattering bodies
is of the order of the wave-length of blue light,
i. e. approximately 0.6 m
or less.
(3) The scattered light is blue,
the transmitted fraction yellowish or reddish;
consequently the blue light is visible only
by reflexion. The object appears reddish, brown
or grey by transmitted light.
(4)
Relative sizes of particles determine depths
or shades of blue; very small micelles or air-spaces
yield violet hues, the larger ones whitish blue
or white.
(5)
The scattered blue light is more or less polarized
in a plane normal to the direction of the incident
beam; the degree of polarization depends upon
particle size.
(6)
The intensity of scattered light is an inverse
function of the fourth power of the wave-length.
(7)
No iridescence or conspicuous changes of colour
occur over wide variations in the angle of reflexion.
(Distinction from interference-colours).
(8)
No blue material is extractable or precipitable.
(In contrast with pigments.)
(9)
The colour may be destroyed by mechanical means,
such as grinding or pounding. (In contrast with
pigments.)
...
(11)
The blue colour may be abolished by mechanical
or chemical removal of the underlying melanin
layer, but can be restored by the application
of any suitable dark material to the under-surface
as a substitute light-absorbing screen."
Fox (1976), p 23-24.
"Brilliant
blue colours abound in many species of fish,
and these striking manifestations are founded
upon the fact that melanophores, packed with
the dark pigment melanin, are present in the
integument, and that surrounding, intermingled,
and specially overlying these pigment cells
are other cells filled with minute crystals
or other aggregates of purine material, notably
guanine. The contents of these guanocytes (also
called guanophores, iridocytes, iridosomes or
leucophores) are of such minute size, and of
refractive index sufficiently different from
that of the fluid cell contents, as to render
possible their scattering and reflexion of blue
light, while the transmitted light fraction
is absorbed y the melanin beneath (but see footnote,
p. 27)". This is the footnote at page 27:"The
many brilliant specular blue or changeable blue-green
patches exhibited by fishes' skin are doubtless
interference colours (see Chapter V)" Fox
(1976), p 25-27.
"Numerous
fishes show black areas due to melanin in the
upper layers of the skin, blue regions arising
from the phenomenon just described or resultant
green when yellow carotenoid bearing cells (xanthophores)
are superposed on the blue loci. Furthermore,
such a fish may exhibit the brilliant changeable
colours of iridescence when the angle of the
observer's vision is altered. The later aspect
due to interference of light by the surfaces
of the thin scales themselves, or by these and
the thin layers of guanine particles not so
placed or so oriented as to manifest the blue
of scattering." Fox (1976), p 26.
Interference occurs when a light beam impinges
upon particles with a mean diameter less than
about 0.7 m
and that are orderly oriented.
"Table I indicates the fact that the iridescent
colours, like the Tyndall blues, occur preponderantly
in the integument, in certain of its derived
structures and in internal membranes. Both types
of colour manifestation depend upon the disintegration
of light by structures whose unit dimensions
are necessarily of the order of the wave-length
of visible light, i. e. 0.7 m
or less. But we have seen that
the manifestation of scattered blues light arises
from optical heterogeneities in a state of random
dispersal, whereas iridescent colours result
from a condition which might be said to be in
direct contrast to the latter, in that the basic
chromogenic units are thin films or laminae,
arranged in uniform layers by periodic secretion
and deposition. The blue colours of scattering
are delicate and easily masked by reflected
white light, so that a substratum of some absorbing
material, such as melanin or haemoglobin, is
necessary for their manifestation. While melanin
often likewise underlies multiple thin transparent
laminae, thus similarly absorbing the transmitted
light and so intensifying the iridescence of
the reflected fraction, the pigment is not always
present; nor does this fact preclude the manifestation
of interference colours." Fox (1976), p
41.
In order to produce green and purple colors,
when Tyndall scattering is the origin of the
blue structural color, a organism must deposit
yellow or red pigments, respectively, above
the iridophores. On the other hand, if the structural
color arises due interference there is a possibility
that green and purple be created changing the
thickness and distance between plates (see Table
1 and
Walin (2002), figure 9).
Table 1 - Schematic relation of wave-length
and colour to laminar thickness, interlamellar
air-space and angle of incidence; pile of twelve
plates, each of refractive index 1.5, after
Anderson and Richards. Adapted from Fox (1976),
p 57.
| Thickness of each plate (m).
|
Distance between plates (m).
|
Angle of incidence. |
Wave-length maximally reflected
(mm).
|
Predominant colour. |
| 0.05 |
0.15 |
60º |
405 |
Violet |
| 90º |
454 |
Blue-violet |
| 0.10 |
0.10 |
60º |
464 |
Blue |
| 90º |
506 |
Blue-green |
| 0.15 |
0.05 |
60º |
520 |
Green |
| 90º |
559 |
Yellow-green |
Transparent scale and China glass are mutant
guppies which do not deposit guanine platelets
in peritoneal wall.
Releasing of this issue is too close to get
deeper, so in order you can understand how chromatophores
work together to produce colors I strongly suggest
you read Bagnara
et al (1968) and Grether
et al. (2004).
References.
Anderson, T. F. and A. G. Richards Jr. 1942.
An electron-microscope study of some structural
colours of insects. J. Appl, Phys. 13:748-758.
Crozier, G. F. 1967. Carotenoids of seven species
of Sebastodes. Comp Biochem. Physiol. 23:179-184.
Fox,
D. L. 1976. Animal biochromes and structural
colors. University California Press, Berkley.
Goodrich, H. B., N. D. Josephson, J. P. Trinkaus
and J. M. Slate. 1944. The cellular expression
and genetic of two new genes in Lebistes reticulatus.
Genetics, 29:584-592.
Hurst, T. D. 1980. An introduction to the chemistry
and biochemistry of pyrimidines, purines and
pteridines. John Wiley. New York.
Mason, C. W. 1923, Structural colors in feathers.
I. J. Phys. Chem. 27:201-251.
Nakajima, M., E. Shinohara and Y. Fujio.1999.
Fluorescent chromatophore detected in the guppy
Poecilia reticulata. Zoological Sci.,16:745-747.
Nayudu, P. L. and C. R. Hunter. 1978. Genetic control
of melanophore ultrastructure in Poecilia reticulata.
J Fish Biol 13:453-456.
Nayudu, P. L. and C. R. Hunter. 1979. Cytological
aspects and differential response to melatonin
of melanophore based color mutants in the guppy,
Poecilia reticulata. Copeia 1979(2):232-242.
Sumner, F. B. and N. A. Wells.
1933. The effects of optic stimuli upon the
formation and destruction of melanin in fishes.
J. Exp. Zool. 64:377-403.
Takeuchi, I. K.1975. Pterinosomes
in erythrophores of the guppy, Lebistes reticulatus.
Jap. Ichthyol. 22:43-45.
Takeuchi, I. K.1976. Electron
microscopy of two types of reflecting chromatophores
(iridophores and leucophores) in the guppy,
Lebistes reticulatus Peters. Cell Tiss. Res
173:17-27.
Ueshima,
G., M. Nakajima and Y. Fujio. 1998. A
study on the inheritance of body color and chromatophores
in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata. u
J. Agric. Res. 48(3-4):111-122.
Yamamoto, T. O. 1975. The medaka, Oryzias latipes,
and the guppy, Lebistes reticularis. In: King,
R. C. (ed) Handbook of Genetics Vol 4. Vertebrates
of genetic interest. Plenum Press, New York,
USA. pp 133-149.
|