By Alan S. Bias
Starting with guppies at age 8, I am still amazed
by the diversity of these little fish over 35 years
later. Like many serious guppy breeders I have dabbled
with a wide variety of species over the years ranging
from killifish to numerous livebearers. While these
can be very interesting to maintain, they just do not
hold the appeal of genetic manipulation found in guppy
aquaculture. The potential of Genetic manipulation and
understanding of the species is what I believe separates
the serious guppy breeder from the hobbyists who migrate
to and from other species of fish.
A breeders decision to show or not can have long-term impact on direction and goals. Many individuals choose not to show simply for economic reasons. Plain and simple, it's expensive to ship to and from multiple shows and enter in multiple classes. Normally the entire breeding cycle of a fishroom is geared towards producing mature individuals ready for show at a set date. Unfortunately this can interfere with the genetic goals of your program. What is best for a show strain is not always best for genetic variation. It is not uncommon for breeders to only show only certain strains and work others for the genetics. The show circuit does create a fraternity among breeders who engage in friendly competition, yet swap stock readily among themselves.
The large number of fixed strains found within worldwide
guppy populations is in large part due to the differences
in show standards. In North America the primary governing
body has been the International Fancy Guppy Association
(IFGA) & its predecessor for the better part of
50 years. Since the mid 1950's shows in Europe
have been governed by clubs from each respective country
with Austria and Germany in the forefront of guppy breeding.
In the Asian theater Japan has been a strong influence
in the realm of hobbyist bred strains for several decades.
In the mid 1990's an attempt to create uniformity in
European standards was implemented by the Internationales
Kuratorium f|r Guppy-Hochzucht (IKGH).
The type of guppy prevalent in North America changed
markedly in the
mid to late 1960's. The IFGA's main focus has always been large bodied
Delta or Veil Tail Guppies in solid, snakeskin, and 1/2 black body color.
Matching caudal/dorsal color in a 1:1 Body to caudal ratio. Multiple
clubs within the association has allowed for a continual cycle of 10 or
more shows in a season. In the early years many, if not most, guppy
breeders participated in the show scene to some degree. As a result many of the
diverse tail shapes and color patterns became rare in hobbyist tanks
or disappeared completely. However, the results
are undeniably visible
worldwide. Well conformed & large bodied fish with intense coloration.
On the downside propagation of new strains stagnated
for many years.
Corresponding with a visible reduction in breeder numbers.
In Europe primary emphasis was based on diverse tail shapes with color
secondary. Size was also of lessor importance. In the end a greater
variety of caudals, patterns and colors has evolved and been
incorporated within the hobby. With fewer annual shows more attention has been given to genetic variation on a broader scale.
The efforts of individual breeders have played a large role in the
multitude of strains.
Perhaps nowhere has this been more evident than in Japan and other Asian
countries. Without rigid standards multiple caudal & dorsal shapes are
the norm. Varied body patterns and non-matching
fin color
are not frowned upon. In lieu of solid colors
more has been created
in multi's of various description.
While the show circuit has been and will continue to be a driving force
in the continual evolution of guppies, it's influence has waned. With the
concept of a World Guppy Association (WGA) and increasing support, an even
greater swapping of genetics is occurring. New
patterns in finnage and color
are being promoted every month. A new kind of breeder is evolving with
the fish. Much more emphasis is again being placed on the understanding of genetics
and creation of new strains.
Until recently there has been very limited contact between the
various continents. Most coming from occasional swaps between breeders
and foreign entries auctioned at shows. In the early mid 1990's the
pace and rate of exchange increased dramatically with the advent of
the World Wide Web. Correspondence was at the
click of a key, instead
of an international phone call or written mail. Language
barriers also
seemed less of a factor.
Not only have the fish been changing, but the way we raise and medicate.
Starting in the late 70's breeders began to experiment with various automated
water exchange & single point filtration (recirculating) systems. The concepts
had a serious flaw in relation to disease with water coming in contact from each
tank. Early water exchange systems relied on siphon tubes and later drilled
tanks with riser tubes. In both cases the water flowed out of a continual drain
system allowing various parasites & infections to migrate into multiple
tanks. Much in the way recirculating systems still do. Today several "trough"
configurations allow for water to drain out of risers and into a "gutter" type
drainage tube. Expelled water never touches more than the tank of origin.
Several diseases, including Wasting Disease (internal parasites),
and Fin Clamping, shut down many fishrooms of fellow breeders during the 80's & 90's.
After 15 years of battling wasting disease in my own two fishrooms I gave in one
day by siphoning fish and water in effort. It was hard enough to just keep a
strain going, much less improve upon them. Most treatments involved dosing an entire
tank or recirculating system to prevent or cure disease. Even when limited success
was achieved it usually left survivors stunted and of little use for show stock.
After several generations of selecting surviving inferior
specimens for breeders
size reduction could be permanent and necessitate outcrossing.
Today several treatments are available for most persistent
ailments making
automated systems more feasible. A new approach in medicating guppies is
preventative based such as periodic worming before clinical symptoms appear. In the
not to distant past preventative measures such as this were not common practice in the
guppy world. Without continued introduction of new generation drugs breeders could
face the same resistance issues faced by the livestock industry created by overuse.
Preventative based schemes normally target certain vulnerable age groups. While pathogens
evolve according to their own reproductive cycles, overuse of medications, combined
with multiple generations in a year could speed up the process. Be selective in your
use of wormers and antibiotics.
Identification of genetic markers for disease resistance and breeder selection
for resistance will solve many current problems. While breeding guppies it became
noticeable years ago that each time one malady is cured
another takes it's place. Much the
same has happened with human disease control over the
past century, only at an accelerated
rate in captive guppy populations. Artificial selection for resistance can result in loss
of diversity if taken to the extreme. It has already done so with commercial breeds
livestock, such as cattle and sheep, using the same approach. Several mutations in
pathogens have surfaced after years of genetic selection for resistance to them.
If a strain cannot survive outside of its sterile production environment we are defeating
the desired result. In my mind this is a fish that has longevity, sound reproductive
ability, natural hardiness (disease resistance), growth potential, and genetic
predictability in "fixed strains" to name but a few. Confirmation issues are too
broad in definition among various organizations to address at this stage.
A breeder should rely on clean water, moderate stocking densities, quality feed, and
breeder selection to create a fish of value to present & future hobbyists.
Most aquarists are only familiar with guppies in pet shops originating from
commercial sources. It is true that the commercial fish farms around the world have
produced countless millions of guppies for the petshop trade. The
hobbyist breeders will never be able to compete on this scale. On the
other hand it is doubtful the commercial farms will ever be able to compete with
combined hobbyists in genetic manipulation and number of strains. Most new genetics
results from the outcrossing of pure strains and not random matings. A fair portion of
commercial strains are not fixed, but 2 way crosses, resulting in little genetic
predictability in offspring. Traditionally they work with very few individual
strains, and instead concentrate on shear numbers of individuals of lessor standard.
Much as any commercial producer, regardless of product. Yes, the incidental "sport"
does occur with such a large volume of output. The chance of it being noticed, much less
identified & selected for by farm employees is far less than in a dedicated hobbyists tank.
This has been and always will be our strength as hobbyist breeders...
|